<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water Memory, Part One: Macro-Memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=water-memory-macro-memory</link>
	<description>a blog about water, health and wellness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incleanhealth.com/blog/?p=237#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>When the primary cluster size reaches 5-8 molecules, yes, almost all macro-memory would be erased. However, electrolysis does not reduce cluster size this low. The lowest I&#039;ve seen, based on NMR data, suggests 12+. This would still account for a substantial amount of macro-memory erasure.

The problem with electrolysis is that even if it could erase all macro-memory, it makes a royal mess of micro-memory. Look at it this way. Water is a cassette tape. Natural energies are like music. Electrolysis is akin to waving a big magnet over the cassette tape. Is that going to add to the beautiful music or merely jumble and destroy what&#039;s there?

My research indicates that it would be better to retain the micro-memory of previously filtered contaminates than expose the body to the jumbled information left after electrolysis. The jumbled information heavily distorts the human energy field. A similar distortion occurs when a cell phone is held to one&#039;s head.

Anything that deviates from Mother Nature&#039;s harmonies ultimately weakens the human body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the primary cluster size reaches 5-8 molecules, yes, almost all macro-memory would be erased. However, electrolysis does not reduce cluster size this low. The lowest I&#8217;ve seen, based on NMR data, suggests 12+. This would still account for a substantial amount of macro-memory erasure.</p>
<p>The problem with electrolysis is that even if it could erase all macro-memory, it makes a royal mess of micro-memory. Look at it this way. Water is a cassette tape. Natural energies are like music. Electrolysis is akin to waving a big magnet over the cassette tape. Is that going to add to the beautiful music or merely jumble and destroy what&#8217;s there?</p>
<p>My research indicates that it would be better to retain the micro-memory of previously filtered contaminates than expose the body to the jumbled information left after electrolysis. The jumbled information heavily distorts the human energy field. A similar distortion occurs when a cell phone is held to one&#8217;s head.</p>
<p>Anything that deviates from Mother Nature&#8217;s harmonies ultimately weakens the human body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 03:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incleanhealth.com/blog/?p=237#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>So if some type of device/water machine is able to micro cluster or break the molecule size structures down to 5-8 molecule size structures using some type of electrolysis, then would most of the macro memory be reduced?   I&#039;ve heard of a water Ionizer company that talks about micro-clustering their water to the 5-8 molecule size.  If this could be verified then perhaps we would have some Macro memory erased water?  

Also regarding your graphics on your &quot;Hydration Cells&quot; looking at the Cl example, you are showing the Negative Oxygen side of the H2O molecule butted up against the Negative Cl ? Shouldn&#039;t the Positive Hydrogen side of the H2O molecule be butted up for the positive negative attraction?  Why do you show it reversed?  What keeps the same polarities facing each other? Just Curious?  Sorry You are right I was looking at the H2O molecule wrong,  2 hydrogen and 1 large Oxygen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if some type of device/water machine is able to micro cluster or break the molecule size structures down to 5-8 molecule size structures using some type of electrolysis, then would most of the macro memory be reduced?   I&#8217;ve heard of a water Ionizer company that talks about micro-clustering their water to the 5-8 molecule size.  If this could be verified then perhaps we would have some Macro memory erased water?  </p>
<p>Also regarding your graphics on your &#8220;Hydration Cells&#8221; looking at the Cl example, you are showing the Negative Oxygen side of the H2O molecule butted up against the Negative Cl ? Shouldn&#8217;t the Positive Hydrogen side of the H2O molecule be butted up for the positive negative attraction?  Why do you show it reversed?  What keeps the same polarities facing each other? Just Curious?  Sorry You are right I was looking at the H2O molecule wrong,  2 hydrogen and 1 large Oxygen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incleanhealth.com/blog/?p=237#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, they do not. You see, water by itself does not conduct electricity so ionizers rely on the dissolved substances within water to function.

When electricity is applied to the electrodes an electrical potential is created between the electrodes the pulls the dissolved substances into a line forming a virtual wire. The water molecules that are adjoining the dissolved substances nearest the electrodes are then broken apart by the electricity.

This process does break apart larger 50 to 400-molecule sized structures into 15 to 50-molecule sized structures. However, in order for Macro-Memory to be considered 95% erased, water should have no larger than 15-molecule sized structures. For 100% assurance, water should have no larger than 6-molecule structures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, they do not. You see, water by itself does not conduct electricity so ionizers rely on the dissolved substances within water to function.</p>
<p>When electricity is applied to the electrodes an electrical potential is created between the electrodes the pulls the dissolved substances into a line forming a virtual wire. The water molecules that are adjoining the dissolved substances nearest the electrodes are then broken apart by the electricity.</p>
<p>This process does break apart larger 50 to 400-molecule sized structures into 15 to 50-molecule sized structures. However, in order for Macro-Memory to be considered 95% erased, water should have no larger than 15-molecule sized structures. For 100% assurance, water should have no larger than 6-molecule structures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://incleanhealth.com/blog/water-memory-macro-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incleanhealth.com/blog/?p=237#comment-136</guid>
		<description>This article really helped me connect some missing information about water I had. Looking forward to the next one. My question is, do Ionizers erase any Macro memory at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article really helped me connect some missing information about water I had. Looking forward to the next one. My question is, do Ionizers erase any Macro memory at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
